A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
five. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping pills on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has long been developed before the Court wherein the sleeping tablets were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected in the liver although not while in the belly. Hence, the recovery of stated sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel for the complainant have also argued that during the investigation on the case the petitioner Bhoora led to the recovery of a motorcycle.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon via the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined from the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
four. Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in Individuals cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
Note: Please fill any field and Click on Search button, If you don't know click here the complete information please leave area blank.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
The case addresses A variety of issues like, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
Accessing free case regulation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any individual seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station resulting from possible health risks and dangers.
Alternative Punishment: In some cases, the court could have the discretion to award life imprisonment as an alternative to the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life behind bars without the possibility of parole or early release.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Search for websites affiliated with reputable legal institutions or organizations. Validate the information against other sources when feasible.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.